Week 2 – Visit to a school
My visit to an alternate school was truly an enriching experience. The interactions seen between various people in the school was a very positive and promising sign and something that should be spread rapidly among various educational institutions, if we are to have a healthy sustainable life in our societies.
I was quite amazed at the freedom given to Children in Poorna. There were very limited rules and therefore didn’t notice deviant behaviours among them atleast during my observation in a few classes. The children were quite free with the teachers and did not show any fear of the teachers. They were more like friends. They were relaxed and shot out questions and gave their opinions, narrated experiences without any inhibitions. They were least affected by our presence in the class and did not try to put up any different behaviours.
I focussed a little more attention on the teachers to see if they were putting up a different behaviour since we were observing. But they too seemed to be unaffected and were quite normal as any they would be. The teachers at Poorna believed that the best can be brought out in children, when they are given total freedom. They were receptive to ideas and encouraged children to open up. The teachers mostly fell into the category of Romantics and entertainers. When I asked one teacher on what she was her idea of an ideal teacher, she said that a teacher has to firstly go without making any assumptions of the students. She should be innovative, flexible, have adaptability factor and should be prepared with a plan b and plan c. She said the lesson plan that they make fortnightly helped them to structure their teaching although it may not be followed fully as planned. When we asked her to categorise her students, it did not even occur to her that she had to categorise them according to their academic capabilities. She immediately told us that there were normal students and a few with difficulties such as dyslexia and ADHT/DS. When further probed about the learning capabilities, she mentioned that there were slow learners and in her words I quote “nothing as good and bad learners, as every child has an innateness about them, learning comes secondary. It is important to have moral values, value your culture by inculcating and practising them”.
In their interactions with the children and the other members of the staff, each one came across as persons with confidence and open to ideas from each other so that they also learn in the process. There was no competitive behaviour in both students and teachers. Unlike the teachers in Padma Sarangapani’s research, I did not see the teacher constructing an identity for themselves nor were the students being submissive and agreeing. One of the student infact very categorically told the English teacher that she was wrong on one account to which the teacher too agreed in a dignified manner. This clearly shows that the learners were not just receiving information passively but were equal partners in the system. Negotiations did take place in their settings, but it was unlike the American schools given in the readings or like any other private schools in our own cities where perceptions of pupils by teachers are drawn depending on their socio economic background, caste, race etc. The negotiations were mostly to bring about a positive relationship or perhaps there could be more which I might not have figured it out with just one day of observation.